• Users Online: 207
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 225-231

A Comparison of the Performance of the Midarm Circumference and the Nelson Weight Estimation Formulas in Nigerian Children

1 Deaprtment of Paediatrics, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria
2 Child Survival Unit, Medical Research Council, UK, The Gambia Unit, Fajara, Gambia
3 Department of Paediatrics, Enugu State University College of Medicine, Enugu, Nigeria
4 Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Anambra State, Nigeria
5 Department of Paediatrics, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kenechukwu K Iloh
College of Medicine, University of Nigeria/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu,
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/NJM.NJM_160_20

Rights and Permissions

Background: In emergencies, two commonly used weight estimation methods are Nelson and mid-arm circumference (MAC)-based formulae. Nelson's method requires the child's age while the MAC formula offers weight estimation without any prior details of the child, which is useful in our environment due to the lack of proper vital statistics documentation. Methodology: We measured the weight, height, and MAC of 1390 children aged 1–12 years. Values got from the measurements were substituted in MAC and Nelson formulae for weight estimation. The estimated weights were compared to the actual weights of the children. Results: A total of 1390 children were enrolled. The mean of enrolled children's actual weight was significantly higher than the mean weight estimated using MAC and Nelson formula. MAC method overestimated weight in children 1–7 years and underestimated weight in those 8–12 years old. On the other hand, the Nelson formula underestimated weights in children 2–11 years and overestimated weight in 1 and 12-year olds. Conclusions: Both the MAC and Nelson method have their deficiencies in weight estimation. Though the Nelson formula appears slightly more accurate than the MAC, weight estimates from both methods were mostly within the actual weight agreement limits.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded85    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal